Sunday, March 05, 2006

Statistics and ... statistics (#100; Topic F)

Last Friday, 3/3/06, the share price of Level 3 Communications was up by 5.4%; that of Google, by a mere 0.46%. Does that mean the former was dominant in the market price while the latter was an also-ran? Not so fast. One must know the base figure on which the percentage is calculated. On 3/3, Level-3 opened at $3.55 and closed at $3.74; 19 cents = 5.4%; Google, $376.45 and $378.18; $1.73 = 0.46%. So, with this added information, one appreciates that a 0.46% change in Google's stock probably has more sway than a 5.4% change in Level-3's. A couple of days ago, a Defense Department report noted that China had increased her defense budget by 35% -- no base figure was provided. Luckily, the Investor's Business Daily (1/21/06) had a front-page story on defense spending by country, using data by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In that report, USA led the pack with $455.3 billion, or 47% of the world's total defense spending. China was an also-ran, at #5 (behind UK, France, and Japan), with $35.5 billion, or 4% of the world's total. Even assuming that China's 35% increase in the DD report is to be added to the $35.5 billion in the SIPRI study, the new total would still be only $47.9 billion, barely 10.5% of U.S.'s total. This merely underscores the point that percentage figures must be handled with extreme care.
Posted at 7:41 pm, Sunday, March 5, 2006

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right that statistics must be treated with care. You cite China's defense budget at $35.5 billion which is probably a significant underestimate. If you multiply that by four or five, you may be coming closer to it. Budget categories such as scientific research, transportation, health and education, etc. can easily hide military expenditures. Careful how you manipulate numbers and don't believe every statistic you read, even if it comes from Stockholm.

3/05/2006 11:35 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home